Angad sent us this.
Kristin responded as such:
I saw a dentist for the first time in 11 years in 2005, after I finally got dental insurance when I acquired my current job. My mother hadn’t been able to afford medical/dental for us since I was very young and in elementary school. In the years between I was fortunate enough to only have a non-infectious cavity or two, nothing like the child in the story.
So what do you do? You brush your teeth an extra long period of time (a habit I still practice, which has been pointed out to me by various roommates) and pray you don’t get seriously ill.
Lack of medical care is a very real problem, while having it seems such a privilege. Having been there, it genuinely hurts me to know families are allowed to suffer through disease and displacement while the wealth disparity looms ever present.
I hope one day, once I get my shit together, I can contribute to assisting the impoverished in some way, too.
So I responded with the following:
I disagree with you all. The boy deserved to die. Was he not
a) a minority,
b) poor,
c) uninsured, and
d) all of the above?
This is not a lesson to bureaucrats working hard to bring pork into their state at the behest of large corporations. This is an issue of PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. As we can tell from Kristin’s story, the boy is at fault because he didn’t spend enough time brushing. I hope other low-income minorities learn from Deamonte’s (maybe he’d still be alive if his name was
Matthew or John?) example, and take ownership of their dental hygiene. They shouldn’t expect millionaires to break off 0.01% of their hard-earned wealth to pay for an $80 dental examination.
And on that note, I think the 23.9% of dental offices currently accepting Medicare should reconsider. Obviously Medicare patients aren’t paying for their own services, and if filling out the necessary paperwork were to be counted as a business expense, they are making less money than they could if they opted only to serve affluent white families. As Adam Smith, the father of modern economics, informs us, every decision should be based on what best serves the individual, because from that the collective fares best. So, as we can see, we all will do better when dental offices serve only white people, and allow low-income minorities to die.
Time to brush,
Jonthon
P.S. Obviously, the entire message is a satirical poke at what response the people who make such decisions would employ, IF they were forced to respond. They won’t ever actually acknowledge the case of Deamonte, and it’s a near-miracle that a newspaper even picked it up. [Indeed, the link Angad sent us no longer worked by the time I got around to blogging this.] Kristin’s case is actually illustrative of nothing less than that people of lesser means must work harder to get their fair share than the rich – systematically guaranteeing that the lower class will never be able to catch up. It’s sad, it’s wrong, and, in cases like Deamonte’s (a beautiful name full of character and originality, truth be told), it’s maddening. That no one will be found responsible, that even if they were they would deny the existence of practical problems based on theoretical solutions, that they would be given nothing more than a slap on the wrist in the relative scheme of things, suggests that the only answer is to bring back the pillories and guillotine.
No Comments »