Total posts 971
Total comments 20

Actor Fox sparks debate, support for stem cells – Yahoo! News

// October 28th, 2006

Actor Fox sparks debate, support for stem cells – Yahoo! News

Stark campaign ads in which Fox’s body jerked uncontrollably were criticized by conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh, who accused Fox of acting or deliberately not taking his medication.

Fox responded to Limbaugh in an interview with CBS, saying: “He used the word victim and on another occasion used the word pitiable. Understand that nobody in this position wants pity.

“We don’t want pity. I could give a damn about Rush Limbaugh’s pity or anyone else’s pity. I’m not a victim,” said Fox, who twitched and rocked throughout the interview.

Rush Limbaugh proves, once again, that he is a COMPLETE ass.

No Comments »


Talent is a LIAR

// October 26th, 2006

Jim Talent and the ads opposing the Missouri stem-cell initiative publicly claim that the basis for their opposition is that “if you read the 2,000 words of fine print, you’ll see that the proposed Amendment actually permits human cloning.”  That is pure horseshit.  I have copied the full text of Amendment 2 below, straight from the Missouri government web page.  Read it yourself, word for word.

Does it permit human cloning?  Hell, no.  What part of the words
No person may clone or attempt to clone a human being.
which is exactly what subdivision (1) of subsection 2 of the proposed new section of the Constitution states, do the opponents find unclear or misleading?  Maybe the “fine print” they are referring to is the first sentence of subsection 3, which states:

Any person who knowingly and willfully violates in this state subdivision (1) of subsection 2 of this section commits a crime and shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of up to fifteen years or by the imposition of a fine of up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars, or by both.

Got that?  Not only does the proposed Amendment not permit cloning, it makes it a very serious crime.  Respectfully, people who devote their professional lives to trying to find cures for deadly diseases are not the type of people who relish the idea of spending the next 15 years in prison or paying a $250,000 fine.

So let’s call their rhetoric exactly what it is: a shameless lie!  Their hopes rest on the mantra of the radical right:  If you repeat a lie often enough, people start to accept it as the truth.

Don’t fall for it.  Don’t let anybody else fall for it either.  Please, between now and election day, pass this along to every Missouri voter you know.  Missouri deserves to be represented in the Senate by someone better than a bald-faced liar pandering for votes.

Wes

2006 Ballot Measure
Constitutional Amendment 2
Stem Cell Initiative
Submitted October 11, 2005
NOTICE: You are advised that the proposed constitutional amendment may change, repeal, or modify by implication or may be construed by some persons to change, repeal or modify by implication, the following provisions of the Constitution of Missouri – Sections 2, 10, 14, and 32 of Article I; Section 1 of Article II; Sections 1, 21, 22, 23, 28, 36, 39, 40, 41, and 42 of Article III; Sections 1, 14, 36(a), 37, 37(a), 39, and 52 of Article IV; Sections 5, 14, 17, 18, and 23, and subsection 17 of Section 27 of Article V; Sections 18(b), 18(c), 18(d), 18(k), 18(m), 19(a), 20, 31, 32(a), and 32(b) of Article VI; Section 9(a) of Article IX; Sections 1, 6, 11(a), 11(d), and 11(f) of Article X; and Section 3 or Article XI.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
Be it resolved by the people of the state of Missouri that the Constitution be amended:
One new section is adopted by adding one new section to be known as section 38(d) of Article III to read as follows:
Section 38(d). 1. This section shall be known as the “ Missouri Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative.”
2. To ensure that Missouri patients have access to stem cell therapies and cures, that Missouri researchers can conduct stem cell research in the state, and that all such research is conducted safely and ethically, any stem cell research permitted under federal law may be conducted in Missouri, and any stem cell therapies and cures permitted under federal law may be provided to patients in Missouri, subject to the requirements of federal law and only the following additional limitations and requirements:
(1) No person may clone or attempt to clone a human being.
(2) No human blastocyst may be produced by fertilization solely for the purpose of stem cell research.
(3) No stem cells may be taken from a human blastocyst more than fourteen days after cell division begins; provided, however, that time during which a blastocyst is frozen does not count against the fourteen-day limit.
(4) No person may, for valuable consideration, purchase or sell human blastocysts or eggs for stem cell research or stem cell therapies and cures.
(5) Human blastocysts and eggs obtained for stem cell research or stem cell therapies and cures must have been donated with voluntary and informed consent, documented in writing.
(6) Human embryonic stem cell research may be conducted only by persons that, within 180 days of the effective date of this section or otherwise prior to commencement of such research, whichever is later, have
(a) provided oversight responsibility and approval authority for such research to an embryonic stem cell research oversight committee whose membership includes representatives of the public and medical and scientific experts;
(b) adopted ethical standards for such research that comply with the requirements of this section; and
(c) obtained a determination from an Institutional Review Board that the research complies with all applicable federal statutes and regulations that the Institutional Review Board is responsible for administering.
(7) All stem cell research and all stem cell therapies and cures must be conducted and provided in accordance with state and local laws of general applicability, including but not limited to laws concerning scientific and medical practices and patient safety and privacy, to the extent that any such laws do not (i) prevent, restrict, obstruct, or discourage any stem cell research or stem cell therapies and cures that are permitted by the provisions of this section other than this subdivision (7) to be conducted or provided, or (ii) create disincentives for any person to engage in or otherwise associate with such research or therapies and cures.
3. Any person who knowingly and willfully violates in this state subdivision (1) of subsection 2 of this section commits a crime and shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of up to fifteen years or by the imposition of a fine of up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars, or by both. Any person who knowingly and willfully violates in this state subdivisions (2) or (3) of subsection 2 of this section commits a crime and shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of up to ten years or by the imposition of a fine of up to one hundred thousand dollars, or by both. A civil action may be brought against any person who knowingly and willfully violates in this state any of subdivisions (1) through (6) of subsection 2 of this section, and the state in such action shall be entitled to a judgment recovering a civil penalty of up to fifty thousand dollars per violation, requiring disgorgement of any financial profit derived from such violation, and/or enjoining any further such violation. The attorney general shall have the exclusive right to bring a civil action for such violation. Venue for such action shall be the county in which the alleged violation occurred.
4. Each institution, hospital, other entity, or other person conducting human embryonic stem cell research in the state shall (i) prepare an annual report stating the nature of the human embryonic stem cells used in, and the purpose of, the research conducted during the prior calendar year, and certifying compliance with subdivision (6) of subsection 2 of this section; and (ii) no later than June 30 of the subsequent year, make such report available to the public and inform the Secretary of State how the public may obtain copies of or otherwise gain access to the report. The report shall not contain private or confidential medical, scientific, or other information. Individuals conducting research at an institution, hospital, or other entity that prepares and makes available a report pursuant to this subsection 4 concerning such research are not required to prepare and make available a separate report concerning that same research. A civil action may be brought against any institution, hospital, other entity, or other person that fails to prepare or make available the report or inform the Secretary of State how the public may obtain copies of or otherwise gain access to the report, and the state in such action shall be entitled as its sole remedy to an affirmative injunction requiring such institution, hospital, other entity, or other person to prepare and make available the report or inform the Secretary of State how the public may obtain or otherwise gain access to the report. The attorney general shall have the exclusive right to bring a civil action for such violation.
5. To ensure that no governmental body or official arbitrarily restricts funds designated for purposes other than stem cell research or stem cell therapies and cures as a means of inhibiting lawful stem cell research or stem cell therapies and cures, no state or local governmental body or official shall eliminate, reduce, deny, or withhold any public funds provided or eligible to be provided to a person that (i) lawfully conducts stem cell research or provides stem cell therapies and cures, allows for such research or therapies and cures to be conducted or provided on its premises, or is otherwise associated with such research or therapies and cures, but (ii) receives or is eligible to receive such public funds for purposes other than such stem cell-related activities, on account of, or otherwise for the purpose of creating disincentives for any person to engage in or otherwise associate with, or preventing, restricting, obstructing, or discouraging, such stem cell-related activities.
6. As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1) “Blastocyst” means a small mass of cells that results from cell division, caused either by fertilization or somatic cell nuclear transfer, that has not been implanted in a uterus.
(2) “Clone or attempt to clone a human being” means to implant in a uterus or attempt to implant in a uterus anything other than the product of fertilization of an egg of a human female by a sperm of a human male for the purpose of initiating a pregnancy that could result in the creation of a human fetus, or the birth of a human being.
(3) “Donated” means donated for use in connection either with scientific or medical research or with medical treatment.
(4) “Fertilization” means the process whereby an egg of a human female and the sperm of a human male form a zygote (i.e., fertilized egg).
(5) “Human embryonic stem cell research,” also referred to as “early stem cell research,” means any scientific or medical research involving human stem cells derived from in vitro fertilization blastocysts or from somatic cell nuclear transfer. For purposes of this section, human embryonic stem cell research does not include stem cell clinical trials.
(6) “In vitro fertilization” means fertilization of an egg with a sperm outside the body.
(7) “Institutional Review Board” means a specially constituted review board established and operating in accordance with federal law as set forth in 42 U.S.C. 289, 45 C.F.R. Part 46, and any other applicable federal statutes and regulations, as amended from time to time.
(8) “Permitted under federal law” means, as it relates to stem cell research and stem cell therapies and cures, any such research, therapies, and cures that are not prohibited under federal law from being conducted or provided, regardless of whether federal funds are made available for such activities.
(9) “Person” means any natural person, corporation, association, partnership, public or private institution, or other legal entity.
(10) “Private or confidential medical, scientific, or other information” means any private or confidential patient, medical, or personnel records or matters, intellectual property or work product, whether patentable or not and including but not limited to any scientific or technological innovations in which an entity or person involved in the research has a proprietary interest, prepublication scientific working papers, research, or data, and any other matter excepted from disclosure under Chapter 610, RSMo, as amended from time to time.
(11) “Solely for the purpose of stem cell research” means producing human blastocysts using in vitro fertilization exclusively for stem cell research, but does not include producing any number of human blastocysts for the purpose of treating human infertility.
(12) “Sperm” means mature spermatozoa or precursor cells such as spermatids and spermatocytes.
(13) “Stem cell” means a cell that can divide multiple times and give rise to specialized cells in the body, and includes but is not limited to the stem cells generally referred to as (i) adult stem cells that are found in some body tissues (including but not limited to adult stem cells derived from adult body tissues and from discarded umbilical cords and placentas), and (ii) embryonic stem cells (including but not limited to stem cells derived from in vitro fertilization blastocysts and from cell reprogramming techniques such as somatic cell nuclear transfer).
(14) “Stem cell clinical trials” means federally regulated clinical trials involving stem cells and human subjects designed to develop, or assess or test the efficacy or safety of, medical treatments.
(15) “Stem cell research” means any scientific or medical research involving stem cells. For purposes of this section, stem cell research does not include stem cell clinical trials.
(16) “Stem cell therapies and cures” means any medical treatment that involves or otherwise derives from the use of stem cells, and that is used to treat or cure any disease or injury. For purposes of this section, stem cell therapies and cures does include stem cell clinical trials.
(17) “Valuable consideration” means financial gain or advantage, but does not include reimbursement for reasonable costs incurred in connection with the removal, processing, disposal, preservation, quality control, storage, transfer, or donation of human eggs, sperm, or blastocysts, including lost wages of the donor. Valuable consideration also does not include the consideration paid to a donor of human eggs or sperm by a fertilization clinic or sperm bank, as well as any other consideration expressly allowed by federal law.
7. The provisions of this section and of all state and local laws, regulations, rules, charters, ordinances, and other governmental actions shall be construed in favor of the conduct of stem cell research and the provision of stem cell therapies and cures. No state or local law, regulation, rule, charter, ordinance, or other governmental action shall (i) prevent, restrict, obstruct, or discourage any stem cell research or stem cell therapies and cures that are permitted by this section to be conducted or provided, or (ii) create disincentives for any person to engage in or otherwise associate with such research or therapies and cures.
8. The provisions of this section are self-executing. All of the provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or unconstitutionally enacted, the remaining provisions of this section shall be and remain valid.

No Comments »


Asshole :: Film Strip International

// October 22nd, 2006

Bush is an Asshole

No Comments »


Call to Action: Google-Bombing the Election

// October 22nd, 2006

Call to Action: Google-Bombing the Election

A good walk-through on how to google-bomb an election – even (especially?) in a mind-year election.   Replete with search optimization AND adwords buys, this walkthrough should be used next time around to highlight POSITIVES of Dems and NEGATIVES of Repubs.  And while a lot of people were involved this time (70 candidates targetted in 5 hours), next time around it needs to be exponentially more involved…we know their think tanks will be working overtime.

No Comments »


A powerful, clutter-busting ad

// October 21st, 2006

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9WB_PXjTBo>Michael J. Fox’s Stem Cell ad

No Comments »


Censorship…

// October 12th, 2006

“Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever.”
~Noam Chomsky
My advisory class, on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, does something called “Open Forum.”  On these days, we discuss issues that affect the students in my advisory. I let them supply and pick the topics.  Recently, Iraq has come up quite a bit.
Today, I had them writing about Iraq for our writing day. I wanted to gauge where we all were at before we jumped into the topic.  At one point, a student asked me about what “the terrorists” do.  I responded to her question by stating, first, that we needed to determine exactly what makes someone a terrorist, and what constitutes defending one’s home.  I went to the computer to google the definition of terror as it is written in the U.S. military code – I have done this several times before – and was SHOCKED to find that it was blocked.  Indeed, a few more attempts revealed that no reference to terror can be searched from our school.
A state institution, and one dedicated to learning, hiding away even public information about how it even defines terrorism?  This baffles me.  How can we expect students from low-income communities, many of whom don’t have access to a computer at home, to have any chance of participating in the debate when we forcibly block their access to even reference material on the topic?  That’s downright undemocratic.
Not surprisingly, the blog you are reading is blocked from school computers as well…

No Comments »


Subways

// October 7th, 2006

Interesting things happen on subways.  I had a very interesting experience on the subway just tonight.  The entire event occurred between the 96th and 110th street stops.

I was riding north on the 2 headed home.  At about 72nd street, a large group of middle-aged black women got on the train and were sitting all around me.  They were having a jovial conversation and laughing it up as I copied words from one word journal to another.  All was well.

Near the 96th street stop, a middle-aged white man came on the train, yelliing at the top of his lungs that all he wanted was food.  “I’m a cancer survivor and I have HIV.  All I want is some food.  If somebody could just give me a penny, I need help.”  Suddenly, I realized that I had a whole bag of pretzels and chocolates from TFA that I didn’t even really want.  They had been given to my be the class facilitator because I was the last to leave and she was traveling to DC.  Upon making this realization, I raised up the bag and offered it to the man.  He accepted, and said thanks.

This would be a great story if it ended here.  But recall that I said it ended at 110th…

The man proceeded to turn away from me and pace in front of the women, finally addressing them: “All of you wannabe Christians, can’t even look me in the eye.  Can’t even give me any food.  If it weren’t for real Christians like this young man over here…”  The women looked displeased, but were saying nothing.

I couldn’t help myself.  “Sir, I’m not a Christian.  You shouldn’t make such hasty assumptions.”  He turned to me, and asked me if I wanted my pretzels back.  Then, he threw them at me.  In response, I said, “No sir.  I want you to have the pretzels.  I just want you to recognize that you don’t have to be a Christian to be a good person.”  He accepted the pretzels again.

The story should have ended there.  We arrived right then at 100th St, the door opened, and he headed toward it.  But then he turned back, and looked at the women again.  Again, he began to slander them.  This time, he started talking about how his brother was a linebacker coach for some football team, and how Giuliana had wronged him, and so on.  He minced in insults to the women in all of this.  Finally, one of them asked him to just leave.  She was more polite than I would have been about it.  Unfortunately, this only set him off further, and about a minute later he made a huge mistake in saying “…you fucking monkeys…”

At that point, I stood up and said, “Give me back my fucking pretzels.  You should never address women like that – you should never address human beings like that.  I am ashamed of you, and I want my pretzels back.  You deserve to go hungry.”

He threw the bag of pretzels at me again, and this time I caught them.  The train door opened at 110th.  He said “You little prick.  Why don’t you get off the train and fight me?”  I replied, “I’m getting off at 116th, can you wait one stop sir?”  The women started rolling in laughter and applause as the man looked at me, startled, and ran off the train.

As it turned out, the women were getting off at 116th as well.  We chatted about the event and exchanged pleasantries until we got there, and I thought about it the whole walk home.

New York Subways.  Where crazy shit happens ALL THE TIME.

No Comments »


My Dad’s Letter to the Editor about Shitkisser

// October 3rd, 2006

Dear Editor,

It’s important that people be aware that John Shimkus was the Congressman charged with the responsibility for watching over Congressional pages. By any measure, that included a responsibility to protect them from pedophiles like Mark Foley. He has failed miserably in that responsibility.

It almost doesn’t matter why he failed. Either he dismissed his title as overseer of the pages as some sort of honorary title that bore no responsibility, or he was completely out of the loop on matters of great importance to his office, or perhaps he chose for political expediency to protect a member of his political party rather than to protect the children under his watch. In any case, he is an embarrassment, not just as a Congressman, but more importantly, as a parent.

Congressman Shimkus should resign immediately.

Wes Coulson
Troy


Update: the video clip that institigated my dad’s letter.

No Comments »


Raid tied to charity work

// October 2nd, 2006

“Raid tied to charity work”

This guy is probably innocent. Steve Jacobs’ comment really catched my sentiment (see article).

No Comments »